Hi All,We discovered some issues affecting new user registration via the mobile app today:SymptomsWhen attempting to register, you may unexpectedly receive an unhelpful "web service error" message.Wor...

A handy feature

Calling all Moderators!

NatureMapr partners with NSW BCT on next phase of Land Libraries

Minor improvements

Discussion

Jennybach wrote:

28 Feb 2025

Thanks @JaneR

Cyperus sp.

JaneR wrote:

28 Feb 2025

it looks like growth is stunted (although doing OK).
Without species iD its not possible to say if this is a local species, or introduced to ACT.

Cyperus sp.

JaneR wrote:

27 Feb 2025

Hi Citycritters,
yes it could be Typha domingensis but in the photo the inflorescence spike looks almost black: if it really is, then this influences the ID.

Are you able to say what the colour of the spike was ? or perhaps even take add in another photo showing the spike colour /

JaneR

Typha domingensis

JasonPStewartNMsnc2016 wrote:

24 Feb 2025

In left edge middle of the first photograph here, at full resolution,
please refer to the spikelets visible and identifiying this species Carex fascicularis .

Carex fascicularis

JasonPStewartNMsnc2016 wrote:

24 Feb 2025

Please also see some more information here in VicFlora (some more up to date, in this less out of date information, than NSW PlantNet at the moment).:
https://vicflora.rbg.vic.gov.au/flora/taxon/ee5496e9-6145-4d6b-8179-afb68bcd67f5

Especially the culms width of, quotation: " ... 3–7(–10) mm wide ... " .
.

Lepidosperma sieberi

Species Richness Score (SRS)

801

Top contributors

JaneR 873
Tapirlord 690
MichaelBedingfield 450
trevorpreston 359
Mike 188
sangio7 143
MatthewFrawley 112
ConBoekel 104
KylieWaldon 99
lbradley 99

Rushes, Sedges & Mat Rushes